IS THE GOLDEN RULE OF INTERPRETATION REALLY SO GOLDEN?

 

IS THE GOLDEN RULE OF INTERPRETATION REALLY SO GOLDEN?

 

The Golden Rule of Interpretation is a modification of the Literal or Grammatical Rule of Interpretation. It allows departure from the Strict Literal Rule by recourse to consequences which may result from the application of the natural and ordinary meaning. The Golden Rule of Interpretation allows the Judges to depart from a normal meaning in order to avoid absurdity. Ever since Lord Wensleydale propounded this rule in 1857 in the case Grey v. Pearson[1], this rule has always been known as the Golden Rule due to its various advantages and problem-solving nature.

 

Following are the various advantages which are provided by the Golden Rule of Interpretation:

 

1)   An apparent advantage of Golden Rule is that it allows the Judge to modify the meaning of words used in a statute, to remove the absurdity which has occurred when the original meaning of the words has been used and apply the modified term effectively in the case the Judge is dealing with at that time;

 

2)   When the literal or grammatical rule of interpretation is incapable to help the Court to achieve clarity, the golden rule steps in to help the court;

 

3)   The Golden Rule of Interpretation guides the Judges in deciding which principles can be applied appropriately while interpreting the meaning of the statute;

 

4)   It takes away the need of making frequent amendments of the legislation to make minute changes as the Judges themselves can modify the meaning of the Legislation and make the Legislation applicable for the case before them;

 

However, to understand whether this rule is really golden or not we must also discuss the certain disadvantages this rule has. Followings are the disadvantages of the Golden Rule of Interpretation:

 

1)   There is no guideline as to when it can be applied;

 

2)   This rule has very limited use, Golden Rule of Interpretation is used only in rare occasions;

 

3)   It is impossible to always predict whether the Court will apply the Golden Rule of Interpretation in determining a case or not. This makes it very hard for the lawyers and people in legal business to properly advice their clients;

 

4)   Even if the ordinary meaning or literal meaning of a word used in a statute seems to be absurd in the eyes of one Judge may not seem so absurd to another Judge. Therefore, it can very well be said whether Golden Rule of Interpretation can be applied in a case depend more on the Judge than the law or rules;

 

5)   The Golden Rule of Interpretation will not be helpful if there is no absurdity or ambiguity in the literal meaning of the words used in a statute;

 

6)   One of the main disadvantages of this rule is that this rule empowers the Judges to twist the meaning of the words used in a statute which may even cause changing of law.

 

Justice Holmes has opined that a word is not a crystal, clear, transparent or unchanged concept. It is the product of thought and has the ability to vary greatly in color and content based on the surrounding circumstances and the time in which such word is sued. Whenever the meaning of any word in a statute is uncertain, there may arise a need to apply the Golden Rule of Interpretation. If the words of a statute give rise to absurdity and ambiguity in the context of a case, they should be considered repugnant in order to Apply the Golden Rule of Interpretation.

 

Therefore, there is no doubt that the Golden Rule of Interpretation is indeed somewhat golden while providing solutions in many cases in which Literal Rule of Interpretation fails to help the Court. However, due to its undeniable disadvantages it could be said that the Golden Rule of Interpretation is not really so golden.

 

PS: To get a clear idea about ‘Golden Rule of Interpretation of Statutes’ please visit this Link.

 

References:

 

·      https://swarb.co.uk/

 


[1] 1857(6) H.L. Cas. 61.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Bridging the gap between Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) and Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Bill, 2023 (BNS)

Image
  Introduction The legal landscape of India is a complex and ever-evolving entity. It is governed by a plethora of laws and regulations that have been enacted over the years to address various aspects of societal behavior and governance. Two significant legal frameworks that shape the Indian legal system are the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and the relatively new entrant, the Bharatiya Nay Sanhita (BNS). In this article, we will explore the differences between these two legal codes and discuss the advantages of introducing the Bharatiya Nay Sanhita. I. Understanding the Indian Penal Code (IPC) The Indian Penal Code, enacted in 1860 during British rule, serves as the bedrock of criminal law in India. It was drafted by Thomas Babington Macaulay and has undergone several amendments since its inception. The IPC defines various offenses, their punishments, and the procedures to be followed in criminal cases. It is an exhaustive document that covers a wide range of criminal activities, ...
Read more

DISTINGUISH BETWEEN NATURAL PERSON AND JURISTIC PERSON WITH EXAMPLE.

Image
  DISTINGUISH BETWEEN NATURAL PERSON AND JURISTIC PERSON WITH EXAMPLE.    Introduction   In Jurisprudence, it is expressly stated that there are two kinds of person recognized by law and they are natural person and juristic person . Therefor it can be said that person is genus while natural person and juristic persons are its species. Below, the meaning definition and overall concept of person are explained in detail.   Person   v Meaning -   The word ‘Person’ has been derived from the Latin word ‘ persona ’. This term has a long history. At the beginning, the word persona simply used mean a mask. Later on, persona was used to denote the part played by a man in his life. Next to that, the very word was used to denote the man who played the part. Later, in Roman Law, the term became synonymous with the term caput . A slave had an imperfect persona . Lastly, the term was used in the sense of a being who is capable of sustaining rig...
Read more

DEFINITIONS & OBJECTIVES OF INTERPRETATION OF STATUTES

Image
  DEFINITIONS & OBJECTIVES OF INTERPRETATION OF STATUTES   DEFINITIONS & OBJECTIVES OF INTERPRETATION OF STATUTES   Meaning of Interpretation:   The term ‘Interpretation’ has been derived from the Latin term ‘ Interpretari ’, which means to explain, expound, understand or to translate. Interpretation can be held to be a process of explaining, expounding or translating any text or anything in written form. Interpretation of Statutes basically denotes an act of discovering the true meaning of the language which has been used in the statute.   Definition of ‘Interpretation of Statutes’:   Interpretation can be defined as the art of finding out the true sense of an enactment by giving the words of the enactment their natural and ordinary meaning. Interpretation of the statutes is the procedure of ascertaining the true meaning of the words used in a statute. The Court is expected to interpret arbitrarily and therefore there have been certain principl...
Read more